ISP customer assignments
trejrco at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 00:46:10 UTC 2009
>From: Robert.E.VanOrmer at frb.gov [mailto:Robert.E.VanOrmer at frb.gov]
>Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 7:41 PM
>To: nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Re: ISP customer assignments
>The address space is daunting in scale as you have noted, but I don't see
>lessons learned in address allocation between IPv6 and IPv4. Consider as a
>residential customer, I will be provided a /64, which means each individual
>Earth will have roughly 1 billion addresses each.
Nope. You should get a ~/56. Even so, a /64 gives you ~18BillionBillion
>Organizations will be provided /48s or smaller, but given the current
>with routing /48's globally, I think you will find more organizations
>for /32s or smaller... so what once was a astonomical number of addresses
>one cannot concieve numerically, soon becomes much smaller. I can see an
Nope, organizations will go for PI ~/48s, and Verizon will be forced to stop
Oh, and IIRC - as it stands now, IPv7-9 are already shot (similar to IPv1-3)
... so IPv10 would be next up, in a century ... or four.
>in the future, and doing it all over again... I just hope I retire before
>comes... The only difference I can see between IPv4 and IPv6 is how much of
Are you retiring in the next 0-3 years? :)
>pain it is to type a 128 bit address... Just like back in the day when
>networks were handed out like candy, one day we will be figuring out how to
>in emergency allocations on the ARIN listserv for IPv6 because of address
>exhaustion and waste.
As for the lessons learned - it is about scale.
32 bits isn't enough, double it 96 more times (or 32 more times for just the
network side, if you prefer) and it is enough.
More information about the NANOG