Minimum IPv6 size

Owen DeLong owen at
Sat Oct 3 02:02:40 UTC 2009

Given that ARIN issues /48s to multihomed end users, I think it would
be wise to accept them.


On Oct 2, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:

> Since we're on the topic of what's commonly accepted in IPv4 land (a
> /24), what's the story in IPv6 land? It seems to me that a /32 is a  
> fur
> sure thing, but others will accept down to a /48, too.
> ~Seth

More information about the NANOG mailing list