IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
Chuck Anderson
cra at WPI.EDU
Sun Oct 18 23:15:12 UTC 2009
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:29:54PM -0400, TJ wrote:
> You say hacks, others see it as relatively-speaking simple additions of more
> functionality.
> You can define any options you want for DHCPv6, write a draft and get
> community support.
> I don't see how that ("continuously evolving DHCPv6 hacks") is any better
> than what is happening with RAs?
The difference is that I don't have to wait for my switch/router
vendor to implement RA extensions, I can just implement it myself in
an open source DHCPv6 server. Software that is embedded in hardware
is very hard to get changed.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list