Who has AS 1712?
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Wed Nov 25 14:57:30 UTC 2009
On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:33 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 08:57 25/11/2009 +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>> shouting. This is all water under the bridge of course and we are
>> moving on;
>> I do not say everything is ideal now. However the RIRs are actively
>> working to publish a complete set of stats files which also includes
>> unallocated resources.
I would've thought IANA would be responsible for unallocated resources.
>> This is the next best thing to full database
>> synchronisation. APNIC and the RIPE NCC are driving this effort.
>
> Perhaps the RIRs could get together and agree on a common whois syntax so that when I check one RIR with one syntax - it would work on others as well?
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4698.txt
More seriously, the theory is that the RIRs are bottom-up driven. If you think a unified whois schema across all RIRs (or even IRIS deployment) would be a good thing to have, there are likely better venues to raise the issue than NANOG.
Regards,
-drc
More information about the NANOG
mailing list