Juniper M120 Alternatives
Mehmet Akcin
mehmet at akcin.net
Mon Nov 16 20:02:31 UTC 2009
Remember to request some quotes for MX-80, not yet released , soon to be out "lower end" routers.
and MX240 3Ds.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-series/mx240/
Normally Juniper sales guys don't quote you things that are coming out soon unless you specially ask for this.
mehmet
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote:
> Thanks everybody for the feedback. I'll likely be getting a few quotes for
> MX series boxes I think, we're in the happy position of having a
> completely e-net infrastructure so we're not limited by interface options.
>
> Thanks again for recommendation, good to know other people are using them
> successfully.
>
> Cheers
>
> Gary
>
>> MX uses the I-Chip same as on M120/320 series. MX would be perfect for
>> any
>> location in the network P/PE if you are talking about E-Net services vs.
>> TDM. They would be a perfect peering box if you are using E-Net.
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/09 10:14 AM, "Gary Mackenzie" <net-ops at monolith-networks.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:04, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder at wisc.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering
>>>>>> routers
>>>>>> these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to
>>>>>> Juniper
>>>>>> M
>>>>>> series routers?
>>>>>
>>>>> have you looked at the MX series?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> ~Chris
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dale
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering
>>> routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P and PE
>>> router roles but never as border routers.
>>>
>>> If there is some precedent for using them in this role that's good to
>>> hear
>>> and I'll take another look, I was loath to move away from Juniper as our
>>> current boxes are been the model of reliability.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ***************************************************************************************
>> The information contained in this message, including attachments, may
>> contain
>> privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered
>> only to the
>> person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
>> person
>> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
>> Windstream requests
>> that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the
>> message or its
>> attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to
>> anyone else.
>>
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list