Upstream BGP community support

Valdis.Kletnieks at Valdis.Kletnieks at
Sun Nov 1 17:59:19 UTC 2009

On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:33:52 CDT, Dorian Kim said:
> Fact is, regardless of whether you or I think it makes any sense or 
> not is that some peering agreements preclude disclosure of the locations 
> of peering, and in some extreme cases even the disclosure of the 
> existance of said peering.

As Louis Mamakos pointed out back in 1992 or so, it's hard to conceal the
existence of said peering:

(Unfortunately, this is the only copy online I was able to find, and it's
missing the e-mail headers. The one I had has gone astray.  Gene Spafford used
to have a copy online for a class, but it too appears to have evaporated.
Anybody got a pointer to the original?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the NANOG mailing list