Peering in Latin America

Jorge Amodio jmamodio at gmail.com
Sun Nov 1 11:42:46 CST 2009


You are still confusing peering and transit with ability to announce
your IP prefix via BGP.

It may be very useful to others willing to help, if you provide a
better detail of what
kind of recipe you want to cook instead of asking where you can find
the individual
ingredients.

Regards
Jorge

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Ken Gilmour <ken.gilmour at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/10/31 Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us>:
>> Ken Gilmour wrote:
>>>
>>> We have BGP4 networks in other locations (IPv4 and IPv6) - Costa Rica
>>> being one of the places that don't have it... We would really like to
>>> be able to implement it here but are finding it difficult to find SPs
>>> who support Customers who advertise their own PI space.
>>>
>>
>> It doesn't sound like you want peering - specifically AT&T's answer
>> implies they think you want settlement-free peering when you just want
>> to announce your routes via BGP (aka paid transit).
>>
>> ~Seth
>>
>>
>
> Yes - Sorry my initial approach to NANOG was not very specific!
> However my approach to the SPs was very specific (and ADN understood
> exactly what I wanted when I first approached them and are working on
> a quote)... I specifically asked how we would go about getting a
> second point-to-point link and peer with them over that link (and for
> existing providers such as ICE and RACSA) how we could upgrade our
> current contract to allow us to announce our own PI space... I am not
> sure how I could be any more specific than that...
>
> Ken
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list