carl.ford at gmail.com
Fri May 29 06:15:01 CDT 2009
VoIP related issues is one of the reason I lurk here.
On carrier routing side voice (including VoIP) is still a closed network.
The group has given references for vendor oriented the efforts of the
John Todd has a list called freenum http://www.freenum.org/ which may proof
IPTELs http://www.iptel.org/ SER group is a good place for a lot of
discussion and you should look at the diverging links at OpenSER.
Everything else is someone closed. GSMA IPX, ENUM, etc.
If you have specific groups you are looking to talk to I have some further
references. And you can contact me directly.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> One more: isp-voiceoverip
> (http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-voiceoverip/resources/). Pretty
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Oquendo [mailto:sil at infiltrated.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:34 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: navog?
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> > On May 28, 2009, at 10:16 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:
> >> david hiers wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Is anyone aware of a voip-focused group similar to nanog? Us voip
> >>> pukes
> >>> have to deal with the issues of allocation, routing, and management
> >>> of phone
> >>> numbers as well as networks, and I have not found a voice operators'
> >>> group
> >>> similar to this network operators' group.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> David
> >> On the other hand, I don't know that I'd want to see a multitude of
> >> messages
> >> from someone saying "My trixbox dialplan doesn't work!" or, (broken
> >> english
> >> purposely inserted) "Why my Cisco Call Manager is tell me to partition!
> > Actually, there is a quite active cisco-voip list over on puck
> > that discusses exactly the CM issues you refer to. (I diverted
> > everyone to that list to keep it off c-nsp and it seems to have grown
> > since).
> > - Jared
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> (removed cc's to avoid sending dupes)
> Agreed, I browse through some of the stuff there and indeed it works
> for cisco telephony matters. Cisco staff has provided some really
> good guidance on matters there, as have Digium staffers for Asterisk's
> mailing list. But I can't really envision an "all inclusive" VoIP list with
> regards to the carrier end, equipment end, programming end, etc.
> Heaven knows I would have like to discuss Nortel and Avaya matters
> countless times but then those conversations would have actually
> ended up shifting towards SIP in which to a degree, they wouldn't
> have even had anything to do with the vendors at all. So I view it
> as a tough call.
> Anyhow, perhaps links should be included:
> http://voipsa.org/VOIPSEC/ (VoIPSA - VoIP Security related)
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip (Cisco VoIP related)
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users (Asterisk Users)
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sip-config (SIP Config (mainly spam now))
> http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/index.html (SIP forum)
> J. Oquendo
> SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP
> "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
> ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things
> differently." - Warren Buffett
> 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
More information about the NANOG