Nathan Ward nanog at daork.net
Tue May 26 16:29:44 CDT 2009

On 27/05/2009, at 8:11 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:

> On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
>> Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using  
>> it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled  
>> garden mindset.
> I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic,  
> but the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.

Note that Tony is talking about 6-to-6 NAT, not 6-to-4 NAT or vice  
versa (not to be confused with 6to4 tunnelling).

I'm not sure that boat has sailed yet.

Nathan Ward

More information about the NANOG mailing list