AH or ESP
nanog at daork.net
Tue May 26 16:29:44 CDT 2009
On 27/05/2009, at 8:11 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
>> Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using
>> it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled
>> garden mindset.
> I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic,
> but the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.
Note that Tony is talking about 6-to-6 NAT, not 6-to-4 NAT or vice
versa (not to be confused with 6to4 tunnelling).
I'm not sure that boat has sailed yet.
More information about the NANOG