you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed garden]

Marshall Eubanks tme at americafree.tv
Thu May 14 17:52:46 CDT 2009


I use SSH tunnels for all mail, but I have had no problems with
DNS over Sprint EVD0 (the OP's issue).

Regards
Marshall

On May 14, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Dave Larter wrote:

> I agree, running monitoring from my laptop at home at
> nights/weekends/vacations/holidays... I need to use most of those  
> ports.
> My answer  was VNP/tunnel everything.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Levine [mailto:johnl at iecc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:36 PM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Cc: rs at seastrom.com
> Subject: you're not interesting, was Re: another brick in the wall[ed
> garden]
>
>> Dear Sprint EVDO people,
>>
>> Your man-in-the-middle hijacking of UDP/53 DNS queries against
>> nameservers that I choose to query from my laptop on Sprint EVDO is
>> not appreciated.  Even less appreciated is your complete blocking of
>> TCP/53 DNS queries.
>
> If I were an ISP, and I knew that approximately 99.9% of customer
> queries to random name servers was malware doing fake site phishing or
> misconfigured PCs that will work OK and avoid a support call if they
> answer the DNS query, with 0.1% being old weenies like us, I'd do what
> Sprint's doing, too.
>
> If you're aware of a mechanical way for them to tell the difference,
> we're all ears.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Dummies",
> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com,
> ex-Mayor
> "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
>
>
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list