Packet Loss to Google, others

Tomas L. Byrnes tomb at byrneit.net
Thu May 14 11:24:32 CDT 2009


All well from Cox in San Diego:

PING googlemail.l.google.com (74.125.19.18) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=0 ttl=246
time=32.9 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=1 ttl=246
time=33.7 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=2 ttl=246
time=35.7 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=3 ttl=246
time=36.0 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=4 ttl=246
time=34.8 ms
64 bytes from cf-in-f18.google.com (74.125.19.18): icmp_seq=5 ttl=246
time=31.7 ms


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Ringsmuth [mailto:andyring at inebraska.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:02 AM
>To: Peter Beckman
>Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Re: Packet Loss to Google, others
>
>Yeah, definitely seeing it here.  Gmail via POP has been dead for a
>while too.  This is via Unite Private Networks (via Qwest ultimately)
>in Lincoln, Neb.
>
>Last login: Thu May 14 10:35:12 on ttys000
>204-Andy:~ andyring$ ping google.com
>PING google.com (74.125.45.100): 56 data bytes
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=233 time=323.535 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=3 ttl=233 time=339.249 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=5 ttl=233 time=334.392 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=6 ttl=233 time=320.491 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=7 ttl=233 time=321.207 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=10 ttl=233 time=320.925 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=12 ttl=233 time=330.371 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=16 ttl=233 time=321.174 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=21 ttl=233 time=336.478 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=24 ttl=233 time=326.038 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=26 ttl=233 time=323.370 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=27 ttl=233 time=330.263 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=29 ttl=233 time=327.915 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=30 ttl=233 time=333.887 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=32 ttl=233 time=334.694 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=33 ttl=233 time=330.924 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=34 ttl=233 time=330.133 ms
>64 bytes from 74.125.45.100: icmp_seq=35 ttl=233 time=333.507 ms
>^C
>--- google.com ping statistics ---
>37 packets transmitted, 18 packets received, 51% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 320.491/328.808/339.249/5.800 ms
>204-Andy:~ andyring$
>204-Andy:~ andyring$
>
>
>
>On May 14, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Peter Beckman wrote:
>
>> Anyone else getting reports of Google (and other destinations)
>> slowness?
>>
>>> From Verizon FIOS Northern VA:
>>
>> HOST: xxx.angryox.com             Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best
>> Wrst StDev
>>  1. xxx2                          0.0%    20    0.6   0.6   0.4
>> 0.7   0.1
>>  2. 10.1.41.89                    0.0%    20    1.6   1.8   1.6
>> 3.0   0.3
>>  3. G2-0-3-891.WASHDC-LCR-08.ver  0.0%    20    1.6   1.7   1.6
>> 2.0   0.1
>>  4. so-1-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR2.veriz  0.0%    20    2.2   2.7   2.1
>> 7.5   1.4
>>  5. 0.ge-5-2-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NE  0.0%    20    2.9   2.9   2.7
>> 3.1   0.1
>>  6. 204.255.168.30                0.0%    20    6.2   9.4   6.1
>> 70.6  14.4
>>  7. cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net          0.0%    20    6.5   6.8   6.3
>> 7.3   0.3
>>  8. 12.122.134.157                0.0%    20    6.2  27.8   6.1
>> 196.8  51.4
>>  9. ???                          100.0    20    0.0   0.0   0.0
>> 0.0   0.0
>> 10. 216.239.48.108               55.0%    20  328.2 335.7 326.8
>> 389.6  20.3
>> 11. 64.233.175.109               50.0%    20  334.7 333.0 325.1
>> 337.4   4.0
>> 12. 72.14.236.74                 30.0%    20  328.3 328.3 324.3
>> 335.5   3.5
>> 13. he-in-f147.google.com        40.0%    20  335.2 328.6 323.6
>> 337.0   4.5
>>
>>> From Cox Fiber in Northern VA / DC:
>>
>> HOST: xxx.angryox.com             Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best
>> Wrst StDev
>>  1. 70.164.19.3                   0.0%    20    0.2   0.2   0.2
>> 0.4   0.1
>>  2. wsip-70-168-111-17.dc.dc.cox  0.0%    20    1.7   9.6   1.5
>> 77.5  20.9
>>  3. mrfddsrj01-ge706.rd.dc.cox.n  0.0%    20   13.2   3.9   1.4
>> 18.7   5.2
>>  4. ashbbbrj01-ae0.0.r2.as.cox.n  0.0%    20    2.5   2.7   2.3
>> 6.4   0.9
>>  5. 209.85.240.136                0.0%    20   39.5  10.5   3.7
>> 63.0  15.3
>>  6. 64.233.175.111                0.0%    20    4.9   4.7   4.1
>> 5.9   0.4
>>  7. 72.14.236.74                  0.0%    20    6.0   6.9   6.0
>> 8.5   0.7
>>  8. he-in-f147.google.com         0.0%    20    4.4   4.6   4.1
>> 7.1   0.8
>>
>>> From Level3 in New York:
>>
>> HOST: xxx.angryox.com             Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best
>> Wrst StDev
>>  1. 208.72.185.177                0.0%    20    0.4  89.0   0.3
>> 303.9  86.1
>>  2. 208.72.184.245                0.0%    20    0.4   0.8   0.3
>> 7.7   1.6
>>  3. ge-6-7.car3.NewYork1.Level3.  0.0%    20    0.5   2.3   0.5
>> 29.9   6.6
>>  4. vlan69.csw1.NewYork1.Level3.  0.0%    20    4.5   6.1   0.6
>> 14.0   4.7
>>  5. ae-61-61.ebr1.NewYork1.Level  0.0%    20    1.6   1.0   0.7
>> 1.6   0.2
>>  6. ae-3-3.ebr4.Washington1.Leve  0.0%    20   11.3  10.9   5.4
>> 19.1   4.3
>>  7. ae-64-64.csw1.Washington1.Le  0.0%    20   14.0  10.9   5.8
>> 18.5   4.8
>>  8. ae-1-69.edge1.Washington1.Le  0.0%    20    6.2   9.2   5.8
>> 60.1  12.0
>>  9. ???                          100.0    20    0.0   0.0   0.0
>> 0.0   0.0
>> 10. 209.85.241.50                50.0%    20  330.9 330.3 329.1
>> 331.6   0.9
>> 11. 64.233.175.219               55.0%    20  316.6 314.4 311.7
>> 317.3   2.3
>> 12. 72.14.236.66                 60.0%    20  317.4 319.6 314.1
>> 328.0   4.5
>> 13. he-in-f147.google.com        45.0%    20  323.9 321.5 312.1
>> 332.9   6.9
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>> Peter Beckman
>> Internet Guy
>> beckman at angryox.com
>http://www.angryox.com/
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>>
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list