two interfaces one subnet
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Mon May 11 16:51:58 CDT 2009
On May 11, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Chris Meidinger wrote:
> On 11.05.2009, at 22:34, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On May 11, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Chris Meidinger wrote:
>>> I would be grateful for a pointer to such an RFC statement,
>>> assuming it exists.
>> Why would an RFC prohibit this?
>> Most _implementations_ do, but as far as network "rules" in general
>> it is a valid configuration.
> That was essentially my conclusion as well: logically it can't work,
> but I wasn't certain where it might be forbidden.
How did you read what I wrote and say what you said? I've read it
several times and I can't get from point A to point B. Did you do a
major typo or something?
I said it is valid. After saying you came to the same conclusion, you
then said "logically it can't work". Your statement not only
contradicts what I said, but contradicts the fact is has and does work.
Let me be clear: IT IS NOT FORBIDDEN. IT WORKS FINE.
More information about the NANOG