Anomalies with AS13214 ?
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon May 11 14:45:25 CDT 2009
On Mon, 11 May 2009, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
I certainly do. This time it is a config error, next time it will be
researcher X doing some testing for a NANOG paper, and the time after that
it will be some RBN test to see if anyone cares anymore to look deeply
into what they are trying to pull off. Our level of sensitivity will
eventually be nullified and we will all be the worse for it.
> anyone but me find it "unusual" that we accept behaviours
> by some that we would find unacceptable by others...
> its stuff like that which provides my strongest motivation
> for things like SIDR...
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:41:36PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
>> Randy doing testing again?
>> Jay Hennigan wrote:
>>> We're getting cyclops alerts that AS13214 is advertising itself as
>>> origin for all of our prefixes. Their anomaly report shows thousands of
>>> prefixes originating there.
>>> Anyone else seeing evidence of this or being affected?
>>>  http://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu/
>>> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net
>>> Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
>>> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
More information about the NANOG