Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
tme at multicasttech.com
Sun Mar 15 16:47:23 UTC 2009
On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Charles Wyble wrote:
> Can we please get this thread closed or something?
Maybe we should start the nanog-law mailing list.
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 23:17, Joe Greco <jgreco at ns.sol.net> wrote:
>>> "Looking around" Rockefeller Center generally isn't a crime.
>>> "Looking around" where you're in my back yard and peeking in the
>>> is, at a minimum, trespass, and if our local cops notice you doing
>>> it, you
>>> can expect that you may find yourself ... severely inconvenienced.
>>> There is no "freedom to look around" on private property, despite
>>> what you
>>> appear to think.
>> Isn't Rockefeller Center private property? ;-)
>> -Jim P.
More information about the NANOG