SUP720 vs. SUP32
BBlackford at nwresd.k12.or.us
Wed Mar 11 19:06:05 UTC 2009
Thank you to everyone who offered advice. I thinks it's clearer what my path should be.
Incidentally, I am using 7300/7200 based units with G1 RP and found that at 200M they start seeing 50% CPU load which is why I'm looking to go to the next step.
Again, thanks to all
From: Bill Blackford [mailto:BBlackford at nwresd.k12.or.us]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:18 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: SUP720 vs. SUP32
Anyone have any experience with SUP32? Please contact me off list.
I'm trying to evaluate a lower-cost alternative to the 720-3bxl.
I'm only pushing a few hundred megs of traffic, exchanging a few routes with less than 20 peers and don't see the need for a 720's worth of throughput in the near future.
Can the 32 handle a full table?
How does the MFSC2A compare to the MFSC3?
Senior Network Engineer
my /home away from home
More information about the NANOG