Facility wide DR/Continuity
gb10hkzo-nanog at yahoo.co.uk
gb10hkzo-nanog at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jun 3 16:15:06 UTC 2009
Some things just don't active/active nicely on a budget.
> Sure, because of inefficient legacy design choices.
Roland,
I'm not sure I understand your argument here.
Budget is very much an issue when choosing between active/active and active/passive. Nothing to do with "inefficient legacy design".
For example, consider the licensing and hardware costs involved in running something like Oracle Database in active/active mode (in a topology that is supported by Oracle Tech Support).
More information about the NANOG
mailing list