Anomalies with AS13214 ?

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at
Tue Jul 28 12:33:45 UTC 2009

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:50:02AM +0100,
 Russell Heilling <chewtoy at> wrote 
 a message of 75 lines which said:

> I guess ROBTEX didn't implement ingress filters after the last
> episode...

It *seems* (I do not know them in detail) that Robtex
<>, AS 48285, is dedicated to measurements, not
to IP transit. If so, it makes sense for them to accept everything.

If I'm right, it means Cyclops was wrong to have a monitor in an AS
which is not a "real" operator.

More information about the NANOG mailing list