Anomalies with AS13214 ?
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Tue Jul 28 12:33:45 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:50:02AM +0100,
Russell Heilling <chewtoy at s8n.net> wrote
a message of 75 lines which said:
> I guess ROBTEX didn't implement ingress filters after the last
It *seems* (I do not know them in detail) that Robtex
<http://www.robtex.com/>, AS 48285, is dedicated to measurements, not
to IP transit. If so, it makes sense for them to accept everything.
If I'm right, it means Cyclops was wrong to have a monitor in an AS
which is not a "real" operator.
More information about the NANOG