AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
shon at unwiredbb.com
Mon Jul 27 01:37:33 CDT 2009
Have you even read any of the other posts on here. I have been talking about
spoofed packets in this thread multiple times. I do know what it is. I would
appreciate you not making stupid comments like that.
chris rollin wrote:
> Apparently not
> Back to the kids' table !
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:38 AM, William Pitcock
> <nenolod at systeminplace.net <mailto:nenolod at systeminplace.net>> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 20:05 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
> > There has been alot of customers on our network who were
> complaining about ACK
> > scan reports coming from 220.127.116.11. We had no choice but to
> block that
> > single IP until the attacks let up.
> ...have you ever heard of forged packet headers? Just saying.
> William Pitcock
> SystemInPlace - Simple Hosting Solutions
More information about the NANOG