AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

Mon Jul 27 05:17:10 UTC 2009

We'll take data from **Trusted** sources.

I'm just not going to take a public open mailing list post as evidence 
at this point.

chris rollin wrote:
> Shon wrote:
>
> Seth,
>
>   
>> I said it could be, not that it is. Thanks for pointing that out. However,
>>     
> I
>   
>> believe the reason they are being blocked at AT&T is the main reason I
>>     
> supplied
>   
>> on my first post. The DDoS attack issue is the main ticket here.
>>     
>
> The ACK storms arent coming from the 4chan servers
> It's just like the DNS attack (IN/NS/.).  It points to the stupidity of AT&T
> uppers
> SANS: Are you or arent you soliciting data?  I have some to confirm also
>
>   
>> It's not
>> because of content, or to piss people off. It's to protect their network,
>>     
> as any
>   
>> of you would do when you got DDoSed on your own networks.
>>     
>
> They are going to get some first hand experience in what Protecting their
> Network
> involves real soon, now.  Blocking 4chan was an exercise in Stupidity
>
>   
>> It's damage control,
>>     
>
> It's a damage challenge.
>
>   
>> essentially, until they find out who is involved and block them, then
>>     
> they'll
>   
>> likely lift the block.
>>     
>
> They don't have the right to do this.  Not in their TOS/EULA/User-Agreement.
>  Not in any sane legal forum.  (I*A*AL)
>
>   
>> This ISN'T the first time this has happened.
>>     
>
> Exactly.
>
> Now you see the problem ?
>   