BGP Growth projections
Mark Radabaugh
mark at amplex.net
Mon Jul 13 01:28:54 UTC 2009
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> Let me be the devil's advocate: why would you need full Internet routing?
> Taking reasonably sized neighborhoods of your upstreams (AS paths up to X AS
> numbers) plus a default to your best upstream might do the trick.
>
> Ivan
>
>
We currently do exactly that - dropping anything longer than a /23 with
default routes to cover anything missing. Since were replacing the
routers anyway I would prefer to have the capacity to do things
correctly rather than what, at least to me, seems a kludge. It is a
very workable solution - just not one I am completely comfortable with.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
mark at amplex.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list