BGP Growth projections

Mark Radabaugh mark at amplex.net
Sun Jul 12 20:28:54 CDT 2009


Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> Let me be the devil's advocate: why would you need full Internet routing?
> Taking reasonably sized neighborhoods of your upstreams (AS paths up to X AS
> numbers) plus a default to your best upstream might do the trick.
>
> Ivan
>  
>   
We currently do exactly that - dropping anything longer than a /23 with 
default routes to cover anything missing.    Since were replacing the 
routers anyway I would prefer to have the capacity to do things 
correctly rather than what, at least to me, seems a kludge.    It is a 
very workable solution - just not one I am completely comfortable with.

-- 

Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
mark at amplex.net





More information about the NANOG mailing list