[SPAM-HEADER] - Re: Point to Point Ethernet - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses
Rod.Beck at hiberniaatlantic.com
Sat Jul 11 06:02:59 CDT 2009
Brian Raaen wrote:
>> Hate to say it, but also some of the cost on the circuits can be blamed
>> on uncle Sam. ATM circuits are currently tariffed that same way are
>> voice circuits. These tariffs are not charged to Ethernet because it is
>> a 'data circuit'. At least that was the case a little while back.
>Are you sure it's "Uncle Sam"? My experience is that voice tariffs are
>always cheaper than data; telco's mantra is still "I Smell Dollars Now".
>The telcos were mightily pissed when we redesigned protocols to pass over
>voice circuits instead of requiring data circuits.
>Usually, non-tariffed lines seem to be much more expensive, as the account
>manager says "Oh, that special order will have to be approved by HQ".
Strictly speaking, it's not Uncle Sam, but the PUCs who review the tariffs.
I would view it fundamentally as a lack of competition. Who can provide ATM backhaul from central offices? In many cases just the incumbent.
Roderick S. Beck
Director of European Sales
More information about the NANOG