Why no SIDR for 174.128.31.0/24
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Tue Jan 13 11:00:11 UTC 2009
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>> [..]
>>> there is some indication that this prefix was assigned for
>>> a specific experiment, the experiment ran, results published,
>>> and then the prefix was not properly reclaimed... and so was
>>> reused for something else.
>> Interresting that you say that. Still using 3ffe::/24 and ip6.int I
>> guess? :) You clearly thought you needed to keep your 'customers'
>> connected on the 6bone using that block of space.
>
> you guess wrong.
Not a guess, it is what you wrote, long live archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00270.html has:
8<-----------------------------
bmanning wrote:
[..]
Sure... there are only a few left. Got rid of two a couple
weeks back. That said....
I will announce the prefix as long as people are using it.
(whine away)
[..]
----------------------------->8
Other references you probably still have unread in your mailbox.
Greets,
Jeroen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090113/bb0ff977/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list