Cogent Haiku v2.0
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Mon Jan 12 19:45:32 UTC 2009
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Soucy, Ray wrote:
> We peer with Cogent. They are very competitive in terms of pricing.
> To be honest, Cogent has been pretty good to us. As long as you
> have a
> 2nd peer (which it sounds like you do) for backup I'd say they're a
> pretty safe bet.
I think you mean s/peer/transit.
> The only problem I've had with Cogent is that they're still not
> ready to
> route IPv6.
> The whole "you get what you pay for" talk is nonsense in my book,
> paying top dollar with places like Sprint because they use the
> income to
> subsidize their other efforts that are taking a loss.
> Ray Soucy
> Communications Specialist
> +1 (207) 561-3526
> Communications and Network Services
> University of Maine System
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Bartz [mailto:mob at bartzfamily.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:54 PM
> To: neal rauhauser
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0
> I like the haiku! On a serious note, we are considering getting a
> connection from Cogent. We currently have connections to at&t, Level
> 3 and TW Telecom. The low cost and high number of peer AS number's
> seems appealing to us. Every carrier has its issues, so I don't know
> what to make of the apparent negativity that I am seeing in these
> haiku threads. I am looking for some first hand experiences to help
> me make this decision.
> Thanks for any assistance!
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:59 PM, neal rauhauser <nrauhauser at gmail.com>
>> Cogent makes a mess
>> My phone rings and rings
>> Unfornicate this!
> Mike Bartz
> mob at bartzfamily.net
More information about the NANOG