Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0]

Brandon Galbraith brandon.galbraith at
Mon Jan 12 18:59:23 UTC 2009

On 1/12/09, Jim Shankland <nanog at> wrote:
> Adam Young wrote:
>> I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for.
>>  Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok.
>> I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though.
> That has not been my experience.  Peering wars have been an issue, but
> aside from that, they've been fine.  (This is transit in San Francisco
> at the gigabit-plus level.)
> Jim Shankland
Seconded. We also have Cogent for gigabit transit. I had far more problems
in the short time we used Level3 for transit than I've had with Cogent.


Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbraith at

More information about the NANOG mailing list