Ethical DDoS drone network

Tue Jan 6 17:05:14 UTC 2009

Justin Shore wrote:
> David Barak wrote:
>> Consider for a moment a large retail chain, with several hundred or a 
>> couple thousand locations.  How big a lab should they have before 
>> deciding to roll out a new network something-or-other?  Should their 
>> lab be 1:10 scale?  A more realistic figure is that they'll consider 
>> themselves lucky to be between 1:50 and 1:100, and that lab is 
>> probably understaffed at best.  Having a dedicated lab manager is 
>> often seen as an expensive luxury, and many businesses don't have the 
>> margin to support it.
>
> At the very least they should have a complete mock location (for an IT 
> perspective) in a lab.  Identical copies of all local servers and a 
> carbon copy of their official template network.  This is how AOL does 
> it.  Every change is tested in the mock remote site before the 
> official template is changed and the template is pushed out to all the 
> production  sites.

That's useful for testing changes to the remote site itself, but it 
doesn't do anything for testing changes to the entire WAN.  I've seen 
_many_ routing problems appear in large WANs that simply can't be 
replicated with fewer than a hundred or even a thousand routers.  The 
vendors may have tools to simulate such, since they need them for their 
own QA, support, etc. but they rarely give them to customers because 
that'd be another product they have to support...

S
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090106/303c6ee0/attachment.bin>