Ethical DDoS drone network

Mon Jan 5 17:54:24 UTC 2009

FWIW, I'm primarily concerned about testing PPS loads and not brute
force bandwidth.

Best regards, Jeff

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Edward B. DREGER
<eddy+public+spam at noc.everquick.net> wrote:
> RD> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:54:50 +0800
> RD> From: Roland Dobbins
>
> RD> AUPs are a big issue, here..
>
> And AUPs [theoretically] set forth definitions.
>
> Of course, there exist colo providers with "unlimited 10 Gbps bandwidth"
> whose AUPs read "do not use 'too much' bandwith or we will get angry",
> thus introducing ambiguity regarding just _for what_ one is paying...
>
> Perhaps "abuse" is best _operationally_ defined as "something that
> angers someone enough that it's at least sort of likely to cost you some
> money -- and maybe even a lot"?
>
> Were the definition clear, I doubt there'd be such a long NANOG thread.
> (Yes, I'm feeling optimistic today.)
>
>
> Eddy
> --
> Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
> A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
> Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
> ________________________________________________________________________
> DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
> davidc at brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq at intc.net -*- sam at everquick.net
> Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
> Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
>
>

-- 
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
Black Lotus Communications of The IRC Company, Inc.

Look for us at HostingCon 2009 in Washington, DC on August 10th - 12th
at Booth #401.