real hardware router VS linux router
hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
Thu Feb 19 20:09:31 UTC 2009
On 2/19/2009 9:37 AM, Ryan Harden wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> While you could probably build a linux router that is just as fast as a
> real hardware router, you're always going to run into the moving pieces
> part of the equation.
> In almost all scenarios, moving parts are more prone to failure than
> non-moving parts.
> Regardless of what you find out in your research, consider the above in
> your cost-benefit analysis.
> Deric Kwok wrote:
>> Hi All
>> Actually, what is the different hardware router VS linux router?
>> Have you had experience to compare real router eg: cisco VS linux router?
>> eg: streaming speed... tcp / udp
>> Thank you for your information
> - --
> Ryan M. Harden, BS, KC9IHX Office: 217-265-5192
> CITES - Network Engineering Cell: 630-363-0365
> 2130 Digital Computer Lab Fax: 217-244-7089
> 1304 W. Springfield email: hardenrm at illinois.edu
> Urbana, IL 61801
> University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
> University of Illinois - ICCN
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
ssd's remove the spindle from the equation..otherwise they both have
fans that do fail.
More information about the NANOG