IPv6 Confusion

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at swm.pp.se
Thu Feb 19 07:03:28 UTC 2009

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Justin Shore wrote:

> Adoption of IPv6 would be better in my opinion if vendors didn't force 
> us to pay a premium to use IPv6.  It's hard enough to convince 
> management that there is a need to implement IPv6.  It's even harder 
> when you tell them how much it costs.  And when they ask what they're 
> getting for their dollars, they are none to pleased to hear that the 
> bulk of it is going to a damn license.

Well, at least some BUs decided that IPv6 should now be included in IPBASE 
which lowers the cost of getting basic IPv6 routing up and running.

Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

More information about the NANOG mailing list