IPv6 Confusion

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at swm.pp.se
Thu Feb 19 07:03:28 UTC 2009


On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Justin Shore wrote:

> Adoption of IPv6 would be better in my opinion if vendors didn't force 
> us to pay a premium to use IPv6.  It's hard enough to convince 
> management that there is a need to implement IPv6.  It's even harder 
> when you tell them how much it costs.  And when they ask what they're 
> getting for their dollars, they are none to pleased to hear that the 
> bulk of it is going to a damn license.

Well, at least some BUs decided that IPv6 should now be included in IPBASE 
which lowers the cost of getting basic IPv6 routing up and running.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se




More information about the NANOG mailing list