IPv6 Confusion

Merike Kaeo kaeo at merike.com
Thu Feb 19 02:58:08 UTC 2009

Opsec wg also....about 2 years ago Ross Callon went to most NOGs to  
solicit input and I suppose now with Joel it'll be ongoing :)

- merike

On Feb 18, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:40:02 -0500
> Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
>> And let me ask you this question, why do the operators have to go to
>> the IETF?  Many of us have, and tried.  I can't think of a single
>> working group chair/co-chair that's ever presented at NANOG and asked
>> for feedback.  If the IETF wants this to be a two way street actions
>> would speak louder than words.
> Without going into details, I have spoken at NANOG, and I've been a WG
> chair, an IAB member, and an AD.  Randy has been an AD.  I can  
> think of
> several other ADs and IAB members who have frequently attended NANOG.
> I'm not saying it's perfect -- far from it! -- but the issue isn't
> nearly that one-sided.
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

More information about the NANOG mailing list