thegameiam at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 19 00:05:14 UTC 2009
If the IPv6 solutions are not going to be 'better' than v4, how about simply making sure that they are 'as good as' ipv4?
Right now, I'd be hard pressed to think of a v6 function which is 'better' and I can think of a lot which are 'not as good as.'
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Nathan Ward wrote:
>> Yep. You asked your vendors to support equivalent IPv6 things at the
>> time though, so when you roll out IPv6 the support is ready, right?
>> The point is that these deficiencies exist in IPv4, and I'm not sure
>> how you would solve them in IPv6 (assuming you can make all the
>> changes you want, and get instant industry-wide support) any better
>> than you solve them in IPv4.
> Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?
More information about the NANOG