adrian at creative.net.au
Wed Feb 18 22:50:54 UTC 2009
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Nathan Ward wrote:
> Yep. You asked your vendors to support equivalent IPv6 things at the
> time though, so when you roll out IPv6 the support is ready, right?
> The point is that these deficiencies exist in IPv4, and I'm not sure
> how you would solve them in IPv6 (assuming you can make all the
> changes you want, and get instant industry-wide support) any better
> than you solve them in IPv4.
Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?
More information about the NANOG