IPv6 Confusion

Adrian Chadd adrian at creative.net.au
Wed Feb 18 22:50:54 UTC 2009

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Nathan Ward wrote:

> Yep. You asked your vendors to support equivalent IPv6 things at the  
> time though, so when you roll out IPv6 the support is ready, right?
> The point is that these deficiencies exist in IPv4, and I'm not sure  
> how you would solve them in IPv6 (assuming you can make all the  
> changes you want, and get instant industry-wide support) any better  
> than you solve them in IPv4.

Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?


More information about the NANOG mailing list