justin at justinshore.com
Tue Feb 17 23:08:21 CST 2009
Steven Lisson wrote:
> I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated, with people
> talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining these with NAT-PT
> could help with the transition after we run out of IPv4 space.
For me the bigger problem is how do I enable IPv6 on my assorted
CE-facing edges when management is still buying edge hardware that can
not and will not ever support IPv6. Our CATV solution can't support
IPv6 (it's not a DOCSIS 3 thing; it's that the specific model of CMTS
we're buying can not do IPv6). Our shiny new ADSL2+ solution can't do
IPv6 and support in hardware can't be added down the road. For that
matter our FTTH solution which is L2 only doesn't really support IPv6
with their pseudo L3 security options.
So 1) how does one get management of a US SP to realize that IPv6 is
coming well within the lifetime of the brand-new equipment that we're
purchasing and should be a major show-stopping purchasing decision, and
2) how do we get common equipment manufacturers to build in IPv6 support
to the equipment we're buying? During our FTTH dog and pony show
process with half a dozen different vendors, I asked each of them about
their IPv6 support and they all unanimously claimed that there was no
demand for it from their customers.
At this point I'm looking at doing 6to4 tunnels far into the future.
More information about the NANOG