randy at psg.com
Tue Feb 17 20:45:33 CST 2009
> cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with
> the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
> space to number their customer edge.
> Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out
> dual stacks to the CPE.
except that, if you do not have enough ipv4 pace to number your cpe
perimeter, you can't do that.
again, take a look at draft-ymbk-aplusp-02.txt
More information about the NANOG