randy at psg.com
Wed Feb 18 02:23:37 UTC 2009
> I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated
the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on
track. of course, to save face, the name has to be changed.
> with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining
> these with NAT-PT could help with the transition
cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with
the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
space to number their customer edge.
More information about the NANOG