Network diagram software

Malte von dem Hagen mvh at hosteurope.de
Wed Feb 11 17:11:17 CST 2009


Hej,

Am 11.02.2009 19:13 Uhr, John Osmon schrieb:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:11:38PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
>> I like the idea of having one physical version showing cables and devices
>> (CDP/EDP/LLDP view pretty much) and one logical view showing IP subnets.
>> Many times I found *documented* networks where this is all combined making
>> it very unclear.
>> The hard part is to visually show what VLANs are active in each switch.

> Most networks need at least two diagrams:
>   - a logical map showing network boundaries/collision domains/etc.
>     (This is where VLANs get documented)
>   - a physical map showing *how* things are connected.
>     (This is where equipment and their interconnects are documented)

the actual needs strongly depend on the design of the network.

If your network is segemented by many routers, it may even be sufficient
to do a dozen or so traceroutes and parse the results ;-)

If you run flat, switched networks with hundreds of switches but only
few routers and possibly extreme heterogeneous subnetting in a
multi-vendor environment, you do not get very far by parsing configs or
"autodiscovering" the net.

It becomes even more interesting if you run active layer 1 equipment
like DWDM boxes or radio connections :-)

Personally, I think most important is a clean documentation of Layers 1
and 2 AND the corresponding contact data for 3rd party
sites/lines/equipment. These are the things you cannot get easily out of
your network, and when experiencing failure on that level, you'll be
happy to have this information on one single map.

Always remember: Layer 3 is easy. Routing is easy. You have a lot of
tools and deterministic protocols. Layers 1/2 are the wild jungle where
you may see strange things happen and are partly blind and constrained.

Combining the maps for Layers 1 and 2, by the way, is possible. Use
colours, line types, and again geometric figures.

Regards,

.m

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090212/1957f56b/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list