220.127.116.11/9 allocation to verizon wireless
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Tue Feb 10 22:37:46 UTC 2009
On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Mark Andrews schrieb:
>> I don't see any reason to complain based on those numbers.
>> It's just a extremely high growth period due to technology
>> change over bring in new functionality.
> OTOH, Verizon is not the only provider of smartphone connectivity in
> world. Most of them try to be "good citizens" and do not waste a
> resource (IPv4 space).
You mean like the 10.x.x.x addresses give to all iPhones in the US?
Wait, I thought NAT was bad? So who is the "good citizen"?
> If more providers would act like Verizon, we would have run out of
> addresses a long time ago (whether or not that is a good or bad
> thing is
> left as an exercise to the reader).
> -- Matthias
More information about the NANOG