v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Tue Feb 10 02:38:33 UTC 2009

TJ wrote:
> When the compliance explicitly requires something they are required to check
> for it, they don't have the option of ignoring or waving requirements ...
> and off the top of my head I don't recall if it is SOX that calls for
> RFC1918 explicitly but I know there are some that do.

I believe that RFC1918 space won't be a requirement for IPv6. I'm pretty 
sure the requirements will change as the addressing changes. Of course, 
I'm sure you will have a lot of NEW requirements. :)


More information about the NANOG mailing list