v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

John Peach john-nanog at johnpeach.com
Tue Feb 10 02:19:40 UTC 2009

On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:16:49 -0500
"TJ" <trejrco at gmail.com> wrote:

> >	The SOX auditor ought to know better.  Any auditor that
> >	requires NAT is incompenent.
> Sadly, there are many audit REQUIREMENTS explicitly naming NAT and
> RFC1918 addressing ... 

SOX auditors are incompetent. I've been asked about anti-virus software
on UNIX servers and then asked to prove that they run UNIX.........


More information about the NANOG mailing list