97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless

Joel Esler eslerj at gmail.com
Sun Feb 8 09:19:10 CST 2009


Exactly.

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:

> Eliot Lear wrote:
> > On 2/8/09 3:24 AM, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> >> Sure, smart phones are becoming more popular.  It's reasonable to assume
> >> that virtually all cell phones will eventually have an IP address almost
> >> all the time.
> >
> > The numbers I keep seeing for so-called "smartphones" in the press for
> > U.S. and Europe are 49% and 50% within two years, respectively.  Here's
> > an article you might find interesting about the U.S. domestic market,
> > and it may help you calculate what sort of growth rate we can expect in
> > the future, when combined with both of the above numbers.  Put another
> > way, the news is bad, but there is a cap on growth.
>
> We live in rather sad times if, subscriber, arpu and internet usage
> growth is considered bad news.
>
> >
> http://albuquerque.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2008/09/29/story10.html
> >
> > Eliot
> >
>
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list