[Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics

Sun Feb 8 05:42:53 UTC 2009

On Wednesday 04 February 2009 09:51:16 am Nathan Ward wrote:

> You get the same with OSPF - you run OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 in
> parallel.

Suffice it to say that some vendors are already implementing 
'draft-ietf-ospf-af-alt-06.txt', which allows OSPFv3 to 
handle multiple address families, including IPv4.

But this still runs over an IPv6 link. I'd still recommend 
running IPv4 and IPv6 IGP's separately, unless the IGP 
integrates both protocols, as in the case of IS-IS.

Cheers,

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090208/3769d0d0/attachment.sig>