v6 & DSL / Cable modems
jloiacon at csc.com
Fri Feb 6 13:35:00 UTC 2009
Paul Vixie <vixie at isc.org> wrote on 02/06/2009 02:20:01 AM:
> the fundamental implication is, forget about address space, it's
> now, it's off the table as a negotiating item or any kind of constraint.
> but the size of the routing table is still a bogeyman, and IPv6 arms
> bogeyman with nukes.
Indeed it does. And don't forget that the most basic data object in the
routing table, the address itself, is 4 times as big.
More information about the NANOG