v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)]

TJ trejrco at gmail.com
Thu Feb 5 20:52:45 CST 2009


>So it fails in scenarios where enforcing network policy is important.

If the policy is address specific, perhaps.
If the policy is segment specific, no prob.


/TJ
PS - for emphasis, I am not arguing strictly for or against either SLAAC or
DHCPv6.  
Both can work, and IMHO should be allowed to do so where desirable.





More information about the NANOG mailing list