Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
jfbeam at gmail.com
Thu Feb 5 02:19:28 UTC 2009
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:35:15 -0500, James R. Cutler
<james.cutler at consultant.com> wrote:
> Clarification here:
> 1/8 was never on the EDS backbone. Was only used locally in one site,
> as far as I can determine.
They might have done that for other customers as well. (to avoid 10/8
collisions.) Personally, I'd think if they were going to NAT at the edge,
they'd only set it up for the machines we were supposed to use, instead,
we could see, well, a lot more than we should have.
More information about the NANOG