Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Ricky Beam jfbeam at
Thu Feb 5 02:19:28 UTC 2009

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:35:15 -0500, James R. Cutler  
<james.cutler at> wrote:
> Clarification here:
> 1/8 was never on the EDS backbone.  Was only used locally in one site,  
> as far as I can determine.

They might have done that for other customers as well. (to avoid 10/8  
collisions.)  Personally, I'd think if they were going to NAT at the edge,  
they'd only set it up for the machines we were supposed to use, instead,  
we could see, well, a lot more than we should have.


More information about the NANOG mailing list