Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Mon Feb 2 16:30:10 CST 2009


On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:17:23 GMT, Johnny Eriksson said:
> Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren at free.fr>:
> 
> > > Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> > > RFC1918 gives you.
> > 
> > Use IPv6.
> 
> For an IPv4 scalability test?  Interesting idea...

Might wanna consider that if you're doing a scalability *test* that burns over
a /8 of IPv4, how do you intend to *deploy* the sucker?  Gonna be a bear
trying to get a /8 or 3 allocated when The Final Days are upon us already...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090202/493db166/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list