Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Michael Hallgren m.hallgren at free.fr
Mon Feb 2 15:14:38 CST 2009


Le lundi 02 février 2009 à 19:22 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a écrit :
> "Paul Stewart" <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net> wrote:
> 
> > What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
> > closed network?  It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
> > sometimes....
> 
> Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> RFC1918 gives you. 

Use IPv6.

Cheers,

mh

>  In a closed lab.  Yes, it is ugly.
> 
> Been there.
> 
> Sometimes ugly can not be avoided.
> 
> > Paul
> 
> --Johnny
> 
-- 
michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090202/fc80cbb9/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list