Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
nanog at daork.net
Mon Feb 2 20:19:18 UTC 2009
On 3/02/2009, at 5:10 AM, Bruce Grobler wrote:
> Most ISP's, if not all, null route 220.127.116.11/8 therefore you shouldn't
> encounter any problems using it in a private network.
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 18.104.22.168
BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/0, version 3321685
I think you will find that "most ISPs, if not all" in the DFZ "null
If they don't have a route covering 22.214.171.124/8, of course packets
destined to that prefix will be dropped.
More information about the NANOG