RBN and it's spin-offs
fergdawgster at gmail.com
Wed Dec 30 23:58:58 CST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb at byrneit.net> wrote:
> That's funny.
> You're assuming that the MLAT  process works -- it doesn't.
> He's also assuming that US on-shore law applies, which it doesn't when
> any one party is a non-US person, at which point it passes to the real
> of National Security.
Well, that's another issue entirely, but you are right. :-)
Unfortunately, folks in charge of "national security" with regards to cyber
issues don't realize that if that they can't stop sophisticated Eastern
European criminals from their ongoing pillage & plunder, they will *never*
stop determined attempts at critical infrastructure, espionage, etc.,
because they will simply use similar techniques.
This is serious stuff, and it is so damned pervasive, and happening right
in plain sight.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
More information about the NANOG