question regarding multi-homing
sfischer1967 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 30 12:08:27 CST 2009
If you are using Cisco...
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Dylan Ebner <dylan.ebner at crlmed.com>wrote:
> We do exactly what you are trying to accomplish. We have two routers and
> two providers. Provider A is our primary and we receive partial routes from
> them (no static route). Then Router B is connected to Provider B with no
> default route (basically it looks like we are not advertising to them). Our
> AS on router b is prepended several times. Router A and B are connected via
> iBGP to eachother. Then, using interface tracking (we are a cisco shop) we
> can fail to provider B. So, about the only failure we cannot automatically
> recover from is if we have our router A interface / layer1 to provider A
> start to fail and we get enough traffic through to keep BGP up, but errors
> make ip traffic fail.
> This failover has worked server times while in production. Mostly we see
> our BGP drop from provider A, but we have also seen link down from provider
> a. In testing we failed links and routers, which always recovered just fine.
> But we all know the lab can be completely different from the real world.
> If you want to see how this work for us, go to bgplay.com and enter the
> Network: 18.104.22.168/24
> Start: 26/12/2009 20:00:00
> End: 27/12/2009 07:00:00
> Pull out 19629 (ME)
> 209 (Qwest, provider A)
> 7263 (GoFast. Dba Sungard, provider B)
> At about 20:11 you see the routes start failing to AS7263 and then at about
> 6:23 the next day they start failing back.
> This example happened when Qwest lost an edge router in Minnesota. Link
> status was up, but BGP tables were lost, so we had no router out to qwest.
> Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer
> Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
> 1221 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403
> ph. 612.573.2236 fax. 612.573.2250
> dylan.ebner at crlmed.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Chen [mailto:simonchennj at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:03 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: question regarding multi-homing
> Hi all,
> Happy new year...
> I have a question regarding multi-homing, mostly from stub network's
> operational point of view. My big question is: what kind of failures
> do you usually see from your providers? Link down? Link up, but
> withdraw some routes? Link up, no route change, but blackholing
> partial or all traffic? Anything else?
> Let's say that I have two local routers (Ra and Rb) connecting to two
> providers, A and B. If router Ra sees provider A with problems of the
> first two cases (link down, link up but withdraw routes), the Rb can
> easily step up. My question is, if I am using provider A as the
> default, but provider A has the third problem (link up, no route
> change, but blackholing traffic), how can I detect it and switch
> provider automatically?
> To state this problem in detail: I use a static default route on Ra to
> forward traffic to provider A, or receive 0/0 from provider A via BGP.
> For some reason, provider A can no longer reach a /24. My network
> cannot be notified (unless, I receive a full internet routing table).
> In this case, all I know is that my traffic to /24 is blackholed
> through provider A. In this case, is there an automatic way for my
> stub network to switch over to provider B? Do I have to do the
> detection and switch over manually? I don't think VRRP can help here,
To him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his
glorious presence without fault and with great joy
More information about the NANOG