bmanning at bmanning at
Thu Dec 17 21:31:50 CST 2009

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:16:12PM -0800, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Silly question: how well would using match the
> need identified in draft-jabley-sink-arpa ?
> It seems like it would be equally well guaranteed to be non-existant
> (short of change in the def of IPv4 and  Like
>, it would get you a valid SOA and nothing else.
> Am I missing something, or is this operationally equivalent?
> regards,
> Ted

	which is likely to be a more persistent as a non-existant
	delegation?   the forward space is almost entirely controlled
	by simple policy - while the reverse tree has some more structure
	around its non-existant state... imho of course.


More information about the NANOG mailing list