hardie at oakthorn.com
Thu Dec 17 17:16:12 CST 2009
Silly question: how well would using 18.104.22.1687.in-addr.arpa match the
need identified in draft-jabley-sink-arpa ?
It seems like it would be equally well guaranteed to be non-existant
(short of change in the def of IPv4 and in-addr.arpa). Like
sink.arpa, it would get you a valid SOA and nothing else.
Am I missing something, or is this operationally equivalent?
More information about the NANOG